It’s a question that vexes vendors of web-based solutions everywhere: why do people still insist on PDF files? And why does PDF’s mindshare keep going up? “PDF is such antediluvian technology!” they say. “It’s pre-web, are you kidding me? It’s so old-f …PDF Association technical resources: an overview
PDF is PDF because files produced with one vendor’s software can be read using a different vendor’s software with no loss of fidelity. Interoperability is key to our industry. The PDF Association is a international membership organization dedicated to …2022: The last year of paper for records-keeping
NARA (The National Archives and Records Administration) is the final depository for the long-term records generated by all other agencies of the U.S. Federal Government. The agency has a key role in preserving the cultural history of the republic as we …PDF 2.0 examples now available
The PDF Association is proud to present the first PDF 2.0 example files made available to the public. Created and donated to the PDF Association by Datalogics, this initial set of PDF 2.0 examples were crafted by hand and intentionally made simple in construction to serve as teaching tools for learning PDF file structure and syntax.PDF 2.0 interops help vendors
The PDF 2.0 interop workshops included many vendors with products for creating, editing and processing PDF files. They came together in Boston, Massachusetts for a couple of days to test their own software against 3rd party files.
As we noted the Sophos blog has a long piece about modern-day link-farming with PDF documents. Less scrupulous marketers have discovered that Google trusts PDF documents more than HTML pages; they’ve been “poisoning Google search results” accordingly.
The notion that PDF document authors are innately pure of heart as compared to HTML pages is doubtless being re-evaluated right now, especially since PDF files are an enormous proportion of important web content, and interest in PDF continues to grow.
Apart from tweaking search algorithms so that PDF files aren’t receiving undue credit just because they are PDF files, what should Google (or other search engine developers) do about PDF? What are, for example, the benefits awaiting search-engine and other application developers that leverage high-quality PDF files?
Once the PDF specification is fully supported (it’s an ISO standard; it won’t bite!) lots of things get both easier and better.
An idea for Google and other search engine developers: to really impress people with your acumen in handling PDF documents, go beyond simply treating PDF as a page-description model, and support high-quality tagged PDF!
What might be possible if search engines were savvy to PDF’s model for semantics and logical reading order?
Although PDF is a page description format it can include all the necessary instructions to allow consuming software to make other choices. Supporting tagged PDF (ISO 32000-1:2008, 14.8, download it for free), by itself, would generate other fairly dramatic new features for browsers.
Accurate abstraction of tagged PDF’s content to vanilla HTML, much as callas’s pdfGoHTML does today (sadly, it requires Adobe Acrobat), would facilitate total flexibility in using tagged PDF on mobile devices. Apple’s iOS browser, Safari, effectively does this today on some HTML pages with “Reader View” – why not also for PDF?
Besides improved indexing for search and the ability to reliably reuse PDF content in web browsers there are many ways in which complete support for PDF technology would deliver substantial value to content management systems and end users alike:
It’s all ISO-standardized, and thus, inherently interoperable.
PDF is here to stay, and tagged PDF offers tremendous advantages for both search and re-use applications. It’s high time that search engine, browser and other application developers decided to think again about the crusty old format users have loved for over 20 years.